Elections. As usual, there is the spare. once here, once the .. Italian and we bounce like tennis balls from one side of the political arena.
Ma .. imagine that this is not possible. Imagine that people have to change the government at every election dramatically ... not because they can no longer be political, but because they can not govern in the same country!
taking Europe as a whole. Or rather, the European Union. 27 countries. If the election were to be coordinated and made to coincide at the same time, you could make a revolution. We have a country that has voted for the Government A. If we take this government and we transfer it in country 2, the government will find itself having to work in a country outside the State by making changes more or less positive cmq be distinguished from those of the previous government. This is because it is not just a move from right to left, but a total distortion of the political class. We translate this argument to all 27 states and superimpose the circle of countries "on the rim of the governments" staggered to a seat. This would mean that all countries have a government other than their ordinary. They spend four years (within which, any government crisis would be resolved by the two poles always present in that four years). The voters of the country gather to vote on the second function of government who have just had, but will not vote for themselves. Rather, their vote will decide the pole of the government that will govern the country 3 and, in turn, will be governed by the party chosen by the voters of another country. In addition to being asked to vote, citizens would be required to give an overall opinion on the activities of that government, a sort of credential for the country which will be found that the political class. In this way, four years after four years, proceedings to any political class will increase or decrease depending on the benefit that will meet in the country have ruled from time to time. This will lead to a sort of overall ranking politician of the classes given by consensus of all Europe.
What are the advantages of this political system?
politicians will tend to work better for two main reasons: 1
. will be compared at each election with political elites of other states (since people have had the opportunity to experience the different governments on their skin). Not only between right and left, but also between different left and right different. This will trigger a sort of competition as not to lose credibility internationally.
2. the fact of governing in a country other than their own, where you do not have property, jobs with a conflict of interest and ability to create parallel networks (in just 4 years would be difficult to deliver us the basics) would facilitate the realization of a real strategy improving public is not affected by personal interests. Also because the main interest would be to achieve consensus and prestige. The European commission or a commission created ad hoc, should check the reliability of the individual, the activity on pain of estrangement government. Every government from bases created by the government of another state and they should try to resolve any problem or pursue the best choices that have proved successful.
From an economic standpoint all European politicians, depending on the office held, have the same salary. If their work will be valid state can continue to perform the same task at the same level or higher. If their actions will not have found favor with the public recede its charge, thus earning a lower salary.
Another advantage would be greater awareness by citizens who, knowing the different possibilities can be obtained, may be critical without being carried away by events. This mechanism will also to a mutual understanding between states. The best practices tested in a state, may be adopted in other states are going to eliminate the practice in bankruptcy (about work, school, health, economy, public utilities, transport etc). Mutual understanding break down the walls erected by prejudice and migliorebbe tolerance among different cultures and societies. Politicians should broaden their horizons by learning the languages \u200b\u200bof the countries in which should be, and as tourists, would be encouraged to know the best country in which they should operate (as opposed to what are usually out of laziness, the native inhabitants. They should have great flexibility to get involved and play a hard task like driving a foreign country but they would with greater objectivity, consistency and impartiality. The entire political class would gain in quality. Maybe then we would get a fair and just society +.
Ma .. imagine that this is not possible. Imagine that people have to change the government at every election dramatically ... not because they can no longer be political, but because they can not govern in the same country!
taking Europe as a whole. Or rather, the European Union. 27 countries. If the election were to be coordinated and made to coincide at the same time, you could make a revolution. We have a country that has voted for the Government A. If we take this government and we transfer it in country 2, the government will find itself having to work in a country outside the State by making changes more or less positive cmq be distinguished from those of the previous government. This is because it is not just a move from right to left, but a total distortion of the political class. We translate this argument to all 27 states and superimpose the circle of countries "on the rim of the governments" staggered to a seat. This would mean that all countries have a government other than their ordinary. They spend four years (within which, any government crisis would be resolved by the two poles always present in that four years). The voters of the country gather to vote on the second function of government who have just had, but will not vote for themselves. Rather, their vote will decide the pole of the government that will govern the country 3 and, in turn, will be governed by the party chosen by the voters of another country. In addition to being asked to vote, citizens would be required to give an overall opinion on the activities of that government, a sort of credential for the country which will be found that the political class. In this way, four years after four years, proceedings to any political class will increase or decrease depending on the benefit that will meet in the country have ruled from time to time. This will lead to a sort of overall ranking politician of the classes given by consensus of all Europe.
What are the advantages of this political system?
politicians will tend to work better for two main reasons: 1
. will be compared at each election with political elites of other states (since people have had the opportunity to experience the different governments on their skin). Not only between right and left, but also between different left and right different. This will trigger a sort of competition as not to lose credibility internationally.
2. the fact of governing in a country other than their own, where you do not have property, jobs with a conflict of interest and ability to create parallel networks (in just 4 years would be difficult to deliver us the basics) would facilitate the realization of a real strategy improving public is not affected by personal interests. Also because the main interest would be to achieve consensus and prestige. The European commission or a commission created ad hoc, should check the reliability of the individual, the activity on pain of estrangement government. Every government from bases created by the government of another state and they should try to resolve any problem or pursue the best choices that have proved successful.
From an economic standpoint all European politicians, depending on the office held, have the same salary. If their work will be valid state can continue to perform the same task at the same level or higher. If their actions will not have found favor with the public recede its charge, thus earning a lower salary.
Another advantage would be greater awareness by citizens who, knowing the different possibilities can be obtained, may be critical without being carried away by events. This mechanism will also to a mutual understanding between states. The best practices tested in a state, may be adopted in other states are going to eliminate the practice in bankruptcy (about work, school, health, economy, public utilities, transport etc). Mutual understanding break down the walls erected by prejudice and migliorebbe tolerance among different cultures and societies. Politicians should broaden their horizons by learning the languages \u200b\u200bof the countries in which should be, and as tourists, would be encouraged to know the best country in which they should operate (as opposed to what are usually out of laziness, the native inhabitants. They should have great flexibility to get involved and play a hard task like driving a foreign country but they would with greater objectivity, consistency and impartiality. The entire political class would gain in quality. Maybe then we would get a fair and just society +.
